Acceptance of what is, as opposed to struggling against it.
Is that true? I can hear Byron Katie question in the background.
When I think about it, the worst that non-acceptance does is lead to further lessons until I finally do accept. How can I lose? Is there any big rush? Will my soul be in peril of being forever cast out if I fail to accept what is in front of my nose in this very minute? In soul terms, does time even exist?
Some folks like to talk about illusion – everything is illusion anyway, they say, so what's the fuss? Or as Nietsche said: There are no facts, only interpretations. Or judgments. So fine, I'll reword my response and say: It's about accepting what is or appears to be so. And especially, it's about accepting the thing that niggles. I think it’s pretty safe to say the thing that niggles has a particular interpretation, a value-judgment attached to it. In other words, it’s more than just what it purports to be.
For example, I see there are lines in my face. No problem, it just is what it is, unless I take it to mean I am getting old or give it some other, usually stress-inducing meaning. Getting old is an interpretation, a judgment, of lines in my face.
It’s all in the way you look at it, people say, why not change your interpretation from getting old to getting wise? But isn’t reinterpreting something I don’t like just another way of not accepting what is? What I see is lines in my face. The minute I attach any meaning, any words beyond the mere observation, I’m in trouble. I look in my face. I see lines. Is there anything difficult about accepting that there are lines? Without any meaning attached?
I don’t have to accept getting old (or getting wise, for that matter) unless it’s there for me, unless it niggles. It would never even get that far if I were able to see lines without any thought of what they might mean. “Ah, lines.” See? Harmless. It’s the judgments that screw me up every time, never the thing itself.
Accepting something fully leaves off any judgments about it.